There is such a case: Mr. Liu and the victim girl were netizens who met through online chat, and the two met a few months later. On the day of the meeting, the man directly pulled the young woman to the hotel and forcibly had sex with her. After the incident, the young woman wanted to call the police, but Mr. Liu, the young man, told her to continue the relationship, establish a relationship with her boyfriend and girlfriend, and confess her true feelings to her. In this way, the young woman also agreed to continue the relationship between the two. As a result, six sexual relations occurred in the three months after officially becoming a boy and girl friend. Later, when the young woman became pregnant, her parents and school teachers found out that she immediately called the police, asking the public security organs to hold the young man criminally responsible. Later, the police arrested Mr. Liu and brought him to justice and interrogated him about the facts and details of the rape. In the transcript, the young woman also said that the first time she was raped, she had no choice but to agree to have sex with him. Afterwards, she had no coercion on several occasions, and they all had sex voluntarily. Then “after the rape, men and women voluntarily had six sexual relations, does it constitute rape for the first time?” After multiple prosecutions and the parties replies, the court held that Mr. Liu and the young woman had voluntarily sex, which was normal sexual intercourse. But it cannot be denied the fact that for the first time forcibly having sex. The case is still under trial, but the controversy aroused is very large. This involves the “sexual intercourse” we are going to describe today.